It had to be pretty slim. That waterboarding practices used by the United States are good. Perhaps you care out of concern for torture creep: It also matters because one cannot fight effectively for a cause one does not understand. And yet, is there a doubt that the wrongness of Why torture is a good thing finds its source, not in a holy book or in the final link of a chain of observations, but deep in humanity's moral intuition?
I commend his superhuman strength and tolerance, but waterboarding is still torture, and this point goes to the con.
Which is why we have arguments about which procedures are fair and just, and which aren't. By the way, I'm not advocating the use of torture, I just want the arguments against it to be good ones rather than bad ones. President Clinton said he would consider torture and President George W.
God gave Moses not one but two commandments against lust, and not a single one against cruelty; likewise, Augustine deemed cupidity a more serious offense.
Log in to post comments By bpower not verified on 29 Dec permalink Which means, Coel, that there is nowhere near sufficient evidence supporting your position to justify any civilized person in entertaining even for a moment the idea that torture should be an allowable option.
There are two common objections to the TBS question itself, neither of them wise. Reality is rarely as simple as the subset sum problem.
But then the argument becomes whether torture is a useful procedure.
First, the claim is unprovable. For the purpose of this essay, however, I narrow down the definition to the forced exchange of information for the relief of unbearable pain.
After all, we're the good guys and they're not, so why should we grant them the same moral latitude? So, yeah, if you're a tyrant in Uzbekistan who is holding control through force of arms, fear is a useful part of the apparatus of control, and torture is a great idea, as are barbaric executions, heads on pikes, and bullets to the back of the head.
Torture rehearses eternal damnation. You torture the guy, he gives up the key. The logic behind waterboarding is to torture the prisoner until he spills the beans. If the goal of torture is indeed to install fear and compliance in a larger population, it could or should fall under the rubric of collective punishment, which is a violation of both the laws of war and the "quaint" Geneva Conventions.
Log in to post comments By Coel not verified on 29 Dec permalink A couple further thoughts. This is the only subtle point of this essay, so I'll begin with a gentle introduction. If, indeed, our only choice is between two acts that are immoral, these two rules alone won't tell us what to do.
If you're going to do it, you'd better be ready to "own it" and take all the blame. I'm not so sure, I suspect that plenty of people such as me would succumb to inexpert torture. We'd move straight to sentencing.
Even on the scaffold or in front of a firing squad, a man can meet death with dignity. The real problem is that fear isn't a good tool to use in a democratic society. President Bill Clinton gave a similar answer: Time is desperately short, but we have captured a member of the group. Legality should offer only a blurry reflection of morality, not its mirror image.
The world may find out as increased attention is being focused on the use of unmanned military drones that are carrying out assassinations of suspected militants in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In the Middle East, there are fanatics who seem to despise death as much as they despise the West.
How to aggregate universal moral principles into decision procedures, a central problem in ethics, is in my view the only interesting aspect of the torture question; the rest is straightforward.
A captive terrorist such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is a culpable bystander, not a culpable aggressor.
The Case For Torture Take this torture thing. But it isn't necessary and good for the reasons most people think. Bentham imagined a gang of torturers who, if they remained at liberty, would torture innocent victims.
Collateral damage would be a problem even if our bombs were far "smarter" than they are now. Yet killing does not make us wince the way torture does. The world but as importantly the American populace knows the US government will not respoect their rights. It is in fact unethical to gerrymander moral boundaries to make it easier to lead a moral life—Bush tried to do just that with his "You're with us or against us.Why the New Torture Defense Is a Good Offense Why the New Torture Defense Is a Good Offense The torture immunity lobby has a new argument--public support inoculates war criminals.
Such a law would implicitly legitimate torture in extreme situations, and that’s a bad thing, but it would also create visibility and accountability, which is a good thing. The burden of proof of the Pro is to prove that waterboarding is good; not that it is better than alternatives, which is not part of the resolution and thus is unrelated to the debate.
Judges should make the distinction between waterboarding being good and waterboarding being better than other forms of torture; this round will not deal with the.
Dec 29, · It’s right there in the title of the thread: “good”. Torture is good for producing fear, but not good for gathering intelligence. Numerous intelligence agencies agree, asshole. Why Torture is a Good Thing. Recently the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi has come under fire for comments she made about torture, once again bringing the topic of torture back into the national spotlight.
A door opens up on a sickening chamber of horror. and all that Obama can say is that torture is good; yea, it is even salvific, it saves lives, it is good and effective and necessary and we.Download